The Divorce Tax Trap: Why Two "Equal" Settlements Are Almost Never Equal
Tax is the dimension of a high net worth divorce that hides in plain sight. It does not appear in the headlines of the settlement agreement. It does not get argued about in court. And yet it can quietly reshape the value of every line item on the page.
Two divorce settlements with identical headline figures can leave the two spouses in dramatically different financial positions once the tax layer is accounted for. The settlement that splits the marital estate cleanly down the middle on paper can be the settlement that hands one spouse a substantially better deal in practice.
Most matrimonial attorneys are aware of tax issues but are not tax specialists. Most tax professionals are not matrimonial specialists. The space between the two professions is exactly where the most expensive mistakes happen.
This is the article on what those tax issues are, where they lurk, and how to structure a settlement that does not give away value by accident.
Tax planning in divorce is not about being clever. It is about being aware. The rules are well established. The question is whether your ettlement reflects them.
The Post-2018 Maintenance Rules
For decades, spousal maintenance was deductible to the payor and taxable to the recipient. That structure made high maintenance figures more tolerable, because the payor was effectively sharing the tax burden with a recipient in a lower bracket.
Since the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act took effect for divorces finalized after the end of 2018, that structure is gone. Maintenance is no longer deductible to the payor and no longer taxable to the recipient. The full background on the post-TCJA treatment of support is in IRS Publication 504.
The practical implication is that paying a dollar in maintenance now costs the payor a full after-tax dollar, and the recipient keeps every dollar they receive. The pre-2018 math no longer applies.
For high-income payors in particular, this often makes a structured asset transfer (a larger up-front share of liquid assets, for example) more efficient than a long stream of maintenance payments. The same value can sometimes be delivered to the recipient at a meaningfully lower after-tax cost to the payor.
The Asset Cost Basis Trap
When marital assets are divided, the transfer itself is generally tax-free under Internal Revenue Code §1041, which treats transfers between spouses incident to divorce as non-taxable events. That sounds like good news, and as far as the transfer is concerned, it is.
But the receiving spouse takes the same cost basis the transferring spouse had. Embedded gain rides along with the asset.
Two stocks worth $500,000 each can carry very different tax bills. One might have a cost basis of $450,000, with $50,000 of embedded gain. The other might have a cost basis of $100,000, with $400,000 of embedded gain. The first stock can be sold with very little tax. The second cannot.
A settlement that divides investment assets purely by current market value, without looking at cost basis, can quietly hand one spouse a portfolio with much larger latent tax liabilities. Equal market value is not equal after-tax value.
The Marital Home and Capital Gains
The marital home is often emotionally and financially central to a settlement, and it carries its own tax considerations.
Under IRS Tax Topic 701, a single filer can exclude up to $250,000 of gain on the sale of a primary residence, and a married couple filing jointly can exclude up to $500,000. The exclusion applies if the home was the seller's primary residence for at least two of the five years before the sale.
The timing of the sale matters. If both spouses sell the home together before finalizing the divorce, they may be able to claim the full $500,000 exclusion. If one spouse keeps the home in the divorce and later sells, only the $250,000 single-filer exclusion applies, unless certain ownership and use rules are met.
For homes with substantial embedded appreciation (common in New York metro areas after a long marriage), the difference between $250,000 and $500,000 of excluded gain is significant. The decision about whether to sell jointly, transfer the home in the divorce, or keep it for later sale should be made with full visibility into the tax math.
Retirement Account Taxes
As covered in the article on retirement accounts, traditional 401(k) and IRA dollars are pre-tax, Roth dollars are after-tax, and the difference is enormous over a multi-decade horizon. The mechanics are described in detail in the IRS retirement plans overview.
From a tax structuring standpoint, the simplest rule is this: do not treat retirement dollars and after-tax dollars as interchangeable in a settlement. Adjust for the embedded tax in pre-tax accounts. Recognize the structural advantage of Roth assets.
There is also a tactical consideration here. For couples where both spouses will eventually be in lower tax brackets in retirement, traditional accounts have a relative advantage. For couples where one spouse expects to be in a much higher bracket later, Roth accounts have a relative advantage. The right split is not always equal; it is the split that minimizes the combined tax burden over the rest of both lives.
Stock Options, RSUs, and Deferred Compensation
Stock options and restricted stock units are common in high-income households, particularly in finance, technology, and professional services. They are also among the most poorly handled assets in divorce settlements.
Vested options and RSUs are usually marital to the extent they were earned during the marriage. Unvested options and RSUs sit in a more complex zone, because their value depends on future service. New York courts have applied various formulas to determine what portion of unvested awards is marital and what portion is separate.
Tax treatment varies as well. Non-qualified stock options trigger ordinary income at exercise. Incentive stock options have alternative minimum tax implications. RSUs are taxed as ordinary income at vesting. Deferred compensation may be taxed at distribution.
Settlement agreements that handle these instruments well typically specify not just who gets what share, but how the underlying tax burden is allocated and how the timing of exercises or distributions will be coordinated.
Filing Status and Year-of-Divorce Decisions
Your filing status for the year of the divorce can affect your tax bill more than you might expect. If you are still married on December 31, you can file jointly. If you are divorced by that date, you cannot. IRS Tax Topic 452 summarizes the basic filing-status rules for divorced and separated individuals.
Joint filing usually produces lower combined taxes than separate filing, particularly for households with significant income disparities between the spouses. The timing of when a divorce is finalized can therefore have a real-dollar tax impact on the final year.
If you are negotiating in the latter half of the year, it is worth modeling the tax effect of finalizing in December versus January. The right answer depends on the income mix, the size of expected refunds or balances due, and the relationship between the spouses.
Similar care should go into who claims the children as dependents, who claims the head-of-household status if applicable, and how any net operating losses, capital loss carryforwards, or charitable contribution carryovers are allocated. These are small line items individually but can add up.
Build the Settlement With Tax in the Picture
Tax is the layer that determines whether the headline settlement and the real settlement are the same number. In high net worth cases, they rarely are.
The fix is straightforward in principle and demanding in practice: bring a tax professional into the planning of the settlement, not just into the filing of returns after it is done. Model the tax impact of each significant decision. Look at after-tax values rather than nominal ones.
A settlement built with tax in mind from the beginning is rarely much more complicated to negotiate than one that ignores tax. It just looks different. And it tends to look different in ways that protect more of the wealth that both spouses have spent decades building.
Frequently Asked Questions
Do I owe taxes when assets are transferred in the divorce itself?
Generally, no. Transfers of property between spouses incident to divorce are tax-free events under federal law. The receiving spouse takes the same cost basis the transferring spouse had, which means embedded gain transfers along with the asset. Taxes are owed when the receiving spouse later sells, withdraws, or otherwise triggers a taxable event with the asset.
Is child support tax-deductible?
No. Child support is not deductible to the payor and not taxable to the recipient. It is treated, in effect, as the payor's after-tax obligation to the children. This is one of the reasons the structure of total support (the split between child support and maintenance) matters; both are now non-deductible, but they have different durations, modification rules, and ending events.
Can we still file jointly in the year of divorce?
Only if you are still legally married on December 31 of that year. If your divorce is finalized before then, you must file as single or, if eligible, head of household. The timing of the divorce can therefore have a direct tax cost, particularly when one spouse earns substantially more than the other. Discuss the year-end filing implications with a tax professional before finalizing the timing.
How do I make sure my settlement reflects the tax math?
Bring a tax professional into the conversation early, and ask your financial advisor to model the settlement on an after-tax basis. The most useful exercise is to compare the after-tax present value of two or three alternative settlement structures, rather than to argue line item by line item. Once you can see the after-tax shape of each option, the right structure usually becomes clear.
Sources
• IRS: Changes to Deduction for Certain Alimony Payments Effective in 2019
• IRS Publication 504: Divorced or Separated Individuals
• Internal Revenue Code §1041 (Transfers Incident to Divorce)
• IRS Tax Topic 701: Sale of Your Home
• IRS Tax Topic 452: Alimony and Separate Maintenance
Disclosures: FMD Wealth Advisors LLC (“FMD Wealth Advisors”) is a Registered Investment Adviser.
This material is for general information only and is not individualized legal or tax advice. Consult your attorney and CPA regarding legal and tax matters specific to your circumstances. This content is intended to provide general information about FMD Wealth Advisors. It is not intended to offer or deliver investment advice in any way. Information regarding investment services is provided solely to gain an understanding of our investment philosophy, our strategies and to be able to contact us for further information.
All information has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but its accuracy is not guaranteed. There is no representation or warranty as to the current accuracy, reliability or completeness of, nor liability for, decisions based on such information and it should not be relied on as such. The views expressed in this commentary are subject to change based on market and other conditions. These documents may contain certain statements that may be deemed forward‐looking statements. Please note that any such statements are not guarantees of any future performance and actual results or developments may differ materially from those projected. Any projections, market outlooks, or estimates are based upon certain assumptions and should not be construed as indicative of actual events that will occur.
Past performance is no guarantee of future returns.
Different types of investments involve varying degrees of risk. Therefore, it should not be assumed that future performance of any specific investment or investment strategy will be profitable. Additional Important Disclosures may be found in the FMD Wealth Advisors Form ADV Part 2A. For a copy, please Click here.